Auricular Confession and Popish Nunneries Volumes I. and II., Complete — A Closer Reading
Edition facts
The catalog record for Auricular Confession and Popish Nunneries Volumes I. and II., Complete — A Closer Reading provides practical reading context through 123,157 words, 8 hr 56 min estimated reading time, and 11 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 28.2 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Catholic Church -- Controversial literature,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
This was the first check my Popish enthusiasm met with; and now for the first time did a doubt of the infallibility of the church of Rome enter my mind. After witnessing these events I could not help asking myself, can a church which sanctions and countenances such flagitious iniquities as I have just witnessed, be a Christian church? Can a body of men, who individually practise such deeds of blood, treachery and crime as those which I have seen, be, collectively, _infallible?_ Are these the men whom the Saviour commissioned, in a particular manner, to preach the gospel to every creature? Are these the men, as a body, with whom he promised to be always, even to the consummation of the world? Are these the men who collectively constitute an infallible church? If so, unprofitable indeed has been my life. It is high time to come out from among them; and if I cannot live the life of luxury and ease, of sin and crime which a Romish priest can live, let me, at least, live that of an honorable man, and a useful member of society.
These were some of my reflections; and accordingly, that evening, I called on the Right Reverend Protestant bishop of--------, with a view of making a public recantation of my belief in the doctrine of the Roman Catholic church. But as chance would have it, he was out of town that week, and when next I made an effort to see him I found that effort in vain. I had not properly weighed the chains that bound me to Popery. I knew not their length, nor their strength. They were stronger than adamant, than steel. They were chains woven for me, in some measure, by beings that I loved. They were thrown around me and fastened to me by hands that I reverenced. They were the chains of early education. I could not break them; they were too strong for me. The force which alone could do this was the grace of God. This I had not. Until then I went about without faith in the world. I soon fell back, in a measure, into my former belief, but not without a resolution to examine more fully the nature of Popery itself, and the practices of its priests. It is well said, a drowning man will catch at straws. It occurred to me that, perhaps, all the crimes and iniquities committed by popes, priests and bishops, and sanctioned by the church of Rome, might be confined only to the old countries, where "use makes law," and that by leaving the old and coming to the new world, where the people made their own laws, and the human mind had its full swing, and thought is only bounded by its own interminable extent, I might find a different state of things. I fancied, at any rate, that man might worship God according to the dictates of his own conscience, without the interference, let or hindrance, save the inherent power and sovereignty of the people. I little supposed that a pure and enlightened people, such as Americans boast themselves, would sanction such institutions as those in which the young friend of whom I have spoken, lost her virtue, her honor and her life. But alas! how sadly have I been disappointed.
Europe is not the only portion of the world that contains legalized Sodoms. Its people are not the only people that support them. Its lawgivers are not the only men, nor its lawmakers the only ones, that make laws for them and give them charters. Its people are not the only people who contribute their time, their lands, their moneys, and who take almost from the necessaries of life, to support monk houses and nunneries, Jesuits and Dominicans. No, no. The new world, the new people, if I may say so, who boast of being the most enlightened people on the face of the earth,--these are the people who, in proportion to their number, contribute most to the support of Popish brothels, modestly called nunneries.
But it will be said that the young lady to whom 1 have alluded, has given no evidence of her being virtuous. As far as you tell us, she has made no resistance, and it is scarcely possible that one whom you have placed upon so high a prominence of virtue, could have so suddenly fallen into the depths of vice. This is all very plausible, and naturally to be expected from those who know nothing of _auricular confession_,--a Popish institution, one of the most ingenious devices ever invented by the great enemy of man, for the destruction of the human soul.
William Hogan opens his two-volume polemic not with theology but with a legal certificate. The first pages reproduce a Georgia court document attesting to his admission to the bar in 1827, followed by a judge's character reference. This strategic move establishes Hogan as a credible witness before he presents any argument. He then addresses readers directly, positioning himself as a former Roman Catholic priest now exposing what he calls the "model" of auricular confession—a model he claims is faithful to the original, however revolting. The preface thus sets a dual tone: legalistic in its reliance on documentary proof, and sensational in its promise to reveal hidden truths.
The Author's Self-Presentation
Hogan devotes considerable space to establishing his authority. The opening pages include not only the bar certificate but also a letter from Judge William Law, who confirms Hogan's "uprightness and integrity of character" during his years at the Georgia bar. This legal framing is unusual for a religious polemic and suggests Hogan anticipates skepticism about his motives. He introduces himself as a former priest who has left the Catholic Church, but the excerpts do not detail his conversion. Instead, he relies on external validation from civil authorities. Readers should note that Hogan's credibility is built on secular, not ecclesiastical, endorsements—a deliberate rhetorical choice that shapes the entire work.
The Metaphor of Book-Making
In the first chapter, Hogan quotes an unnamed writer who compares book-making to "pouring water from one vessel into another." He applies this observation to theology, claiming that most theological works merely repackage old ideas. Hogan then contrasts this with the promise of his own book, which he implies will offer something new. He praises American theologians as possessing "minds like their own rivers"—clear, deep, and pure—yet laments that they have not produced original systems. This passage reveals Hogan's self-awareness about the genre he is working in: he knows his readers may be familiar with anti-Catholic literature, and he attempts to distinguish his work by emphasizing his firsthand experience as a former insider.
The Model of Confession
Hogan describes his method as that of an "artist" or "sculptor" who creates a faithful likeness of a deformed object. He claims to exhibit a "model" of auricular confession, drawn from the original Catholic practice. The language is deliberately provocative: he warns that parts of the model may appear "revolting to the delicate sensibilities" of readers, but insists that the original is formed by "the sacred hands of His Holiness the Pope and his pious priests." This framing allows Hogan to present graphic descriptions while deflecting responsibility—he is merely copying the original. The excerpts do not include the detailed accusations that follow, but the rhetorical setup is clear: Hogan positions himself as a truth-teller exposing a corrupt institution.
Structure and Scope
The table of contents shows that the work is divided into two volumes, each containing multiple sections. Volume I includes an introduction, the main treatise on auricular confession, and a section on the destruction of the Spanish Inquisition. Volume II adds a preface and continues the attack on nunneries. The list of illustrations—"A Young Lady Confessing to a Priest," "The Mother Abbess Strangling the Infant," "The Father in pursuit of the Priest"—indicates that the book uses dramatic visual imagery to reinforce its arguments. Readers should be aware that the excerpts provided cover only the opening pages; the later sections likely contain the detailed accusations hinted at in the preface.
Hogan's work is best approached as a period document in American anti-Catholic literature. The legal certificates and the author's self-presentation as a former priest are central to its persuasive strategy. Readers should note that the excerpts do not include the substantive accusations against confession and convents; the full text likely expands on the model Hogan promises to exhibit. The work's structure—two volumes, multiple sections, and illustrations—suggests a systematic attack rather than a spontaneous pamphlet.
I remember the strange ache of finishing Hogan’s raging volumes—so much heat, so little light. It left me wanting something steadier, a voice that wrestled with human failing yet remembered grace. Later, I found that whisper in The Expositor's Bible: The Second Epistle to the Corinthians — Story, Setting & Ideas, where wounded honesty finally feels like home, not accusation. Strange how different those two books breathe, yet both keep vigil over the same broken heart.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
What was your reading experience?
Capture what you thought, learned, and would like to remember.