The Expositor's Bible: The Epistle of St Paul to the Romans — Reading Notes
Edition facts
For The Expositor's Bible: The Epistle of St Paul to the Romans — Reading Notes, the stored edition analysis reports 136,447 words, 9 hr 54 min estimated reading time, and 18 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 22.5 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Bible. Romans -- Commentaries,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
Sidenote: Ver. 3.] It was =concerning His Son, Jesus Christ our Lord.= Whatever the prophets themselves knew, or did not know, of the inmost import of their records and utterances, the import was this. The Lord and the Apostles do not commit us to believe that the old seers ever had a _full_ conscious foresight, or even that in all they "wrote of Him" they knew that it was of Him they wrote; though they _had_ insights above nature, and knew it, as when David "in the Spirit called Him Lord," and Abraham "saw His day." But they do amply commit us to believe, if we are indeed their disciples, that the whole revelation through Israel did, in a way quite of its own kind, "concern the Son of God." See this in such leading places as Luke xxiv. 25-27; John v. 39, 46; Acts iii. 21-25, x. 43, xxviii. 23.
A Mahometan in Southern India, not long ago, was first drawn to faith in Jesus Christ by reading the genealogy with which St Matthew begins his narrative. Such a procession, he thought, must lead up a mighty name; and he approached with reverence the story of the Nativity. That genealogy is, in a certain sense, the prophecies in compendium. Its avenue is the miniature of theirs. Let us sometimes go back, as it were, and approach the Lord again through the ranks of His holy foretellers, to get a new impression of His majesty.
"_Concerning His Son._" Around that radiant word, full of light and heat, the cold mists of many speculations have rolled themselves, as man has tried to analyse a divine and boundless fact. For St Paul, and for us, the fact is everything, for peace and life. This Jesus Christ is true Man; that is certain. He is also, if we trust His life and word, true Son of God. He is on the one hand personally distinct from Him whom He calls Father, and whom He loves, and who loves Him with infinite love. On the other hand He is so related to Him that He fully possesses His Nature, while He has that Nature wholly from Him. This is the teaching of Gospels and Epistles; this is the Catholic Faith. Jesus Christ is God, is Divine, truly and fully. He is implicitly called by the incommunicable Name (compare John xii. 41 with Isa. vi. 7). He is openly called God in His own presence on earth (John xx. 28). But what is, if possible, even mere significant, because deeper below the surface--He is regarded as the eternally satisfying Object of man's trust and love (_e.g._ Phil. iii. 21, Eph. iii. 19). Yet Jesus Christ is always preached as related Son-wise to Another, so truly that the mutual love of the Two is freely adduced as type and motive for our love.
We can hardly make too much, in thought and teaching, of this Divine Sonship, this Filial Godhead. It is the very "Secret of God" (Col. ii. 2), both as a light to guide our reason to the foot of the Throne, and as a power upon the heart. "He that hath the Son hath the Father"; "He that hath seen Me hath seen the Father"; "He hath translated us into the kingdom of the Son of His Love."
=Who was born of the seed of David, according to the flesh.= So the New Testament begins (Matt. i. 1); so it almost closes (Rev. xxii. 6). St Paul, in later years, recalls the Lord's human pedigree again (2 Tim. ii. 8): "Remember that Jesus Christ, _of the seed of David_, is risen from the dead." The old Apostle in that last passage, has entered the shadow of death; he feels with one hand for the rock of history, with the other for the pulse of eternal love. Here was the rock; the Lord of life was the Child of history, Son and Heir of a historical king, and then, as such, the Child of prophecy too. And this, against all surface appearances beforehand. The Davidic "ground" (Isa. liii. 2) had seemed to be dry as dust for generations, when the Root of endless life sprang up in it.
Moule opens his exposition with a striking admission: his translation of Romans is deliberately 'rough and formless,' designed not for continuous reading but to spotlight particular exegetical points. This self-aware approach sets the tone for a commentary that prioritizes precision over polish. The work is part of the Expositor's Bible series, edited by W. Robertson Nicoll, and Moule dedicates it to Robert Sinker, librarian of Trinity College, Cambridge, acknowledging a debt of thirty-two years. The preface reveals a commentator who is 'little disposed to speak about his Commentary' after the task, instead dwelling on 'reverence and wonder over the Text.'
A Rough Translation for Detailed Study
Moule explains that his rendering of the Greek is often 'rough and formless' because it serves the explanation of details rather than a connected reading. He notes that a rough piece of rendering, which would be a misrepresentation in a continuous version, becomes acceptable when it 'calls the reader's attention to a particular point presented for study at the moment.' This method is evident in his treatment of the Greek article, where he ventures to explain it by words like 'our' or 'true,' acknowledging that such renderings are 'open to criticism' but intended only as suggestions. The commentary thus functions as a running translation interspersed with exposition, with phrases from Moule's own translation printed in bold type. This structural choice makes the work a hybrid: part translation, part homiletical commentary, and part grammatical note.
The Spirit's Leading and Sonship
In the excerpt on Romans 8:14-16, Moule emphasizes that believers are 'led by God's Spirit' and that this leading is the mark of sonship. He argues that the Spirit does not lead back to a 'spirit of slavery' and fear, but to a 'Spirit of adoption' in which believers cry 'Abba, Father.' Moule unpacks the paradox that the believer remains a 'bondservant' in terms of absolute ownership, yet has entered into the depths of sonship. He writes that the Spirit 'sheds abroad God's love' and brings home 'the sober certainty of the promises of the Word.' The believer responds to the 'paternal smile' with 'a son's deep love.' This passage illustrates Moule's characteristic fusion of doctrinal exposition with pastoral warmth, as he insists that the believer is 'dearer than he can know to his Father.'
The Indweller and the Believer's Response
Moule's exposition of Romans 8:13-14 stresses that the believer must 'do sin to death by the Spirit' and yield to be 'led along by the Spirit.' He describes this as welcoming the 'Indweller to have His holy way with your springs of thought and will.' The language is intimate and dynamic: the Spirit 'fills' the believer, who then 'treads upon the power of the enemy.' Moule is careful to distinguish this from mere discipline or direct effort; it is 'by the believing use of the Spirit.' The fulness of the Spirit is 'according to surrendering faith.' This section reveals Moule's emphasis on the Spirit's agency in sanctification, a theme that runs through his commentary. He also engages with the Greek text, noting that the Spirit's witness is with 'our spirit' (Romans 8:16), and that the believer is a 'born child' (tekna) of God.
Moule's commentary rewards readers who attend to his translational choices and his careful parsing of Pauline logic. The work is best approached not as a standalone reading of Romans, but as a companion that slows the reader down, forcing attention to the Greek article, the force of prepositions, and the flow of argument. Those interested in the history of British evangelical interpretation will find Moule a representative voice of late-nineteenth-century Cambridge Anglicanism, blending doctrinal rigor with devotional warmth.
There’s a quiet comfort in Moule’s slow tracing of Romans, how he lingers on union with Christ rather than rushing to conclusions. It reminds me of sitting with an old friend’s marginalia. Sometimes I set it down and open The Doré Bible Gallery, Volume 7 — A Closer Reading instead, letting the engravings hold the same weight of scripture in a different light.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
What was your reading experience?
Capture what you thought, learned, and would like to remember.