The Apology of the Church of England — Reading Notes

(0 User reviews)   289
In Category - Sacred Texts
Jewel, John, 1522-1571, Morley, Henry, 1822-1894 [Editor], Bacon, Anne Cooke, Lady, 1528?-1610 [Translator] Project Gutenberg 2006 Not confirmed
Church of England -- Apologetic works; Anglican Communion -- Apologetic works Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 45,948
Reading time 200 min
Text sections 4

The catalog record for The Apology of the Church of England — Reading Notes provides practical reading context through 45,948 words, 3 hr 20 min estimated reading time, and 4 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 37.0 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Church of England -- Apologetic works,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

This editorial note examines John Jewel's 1562 Latin defense of the English Reformation, translated by Anne Cooke Bacon, focusing on its rhetorical strategies—particularly the use of patristic authority, vivid metaphors (e.g., 'nose of wax'), and direct address to opponents—to argue that the Reformed Church restored primitive Christianity.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.6/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

Thus did the holy fathers always fight against the heretics with none other force than with the Holy Scriptures. St. Augustine, when he disputed against Petilian, a heretic of the Donatists: "Let not these words," quoth he, "be heard between us, 'I say, or you say:' let us rather speak in this wise: 'Thus saith the Lord.' There let us seek the Church: there let us boult out our cause." Likewise St. Hierom: "All those things," saith he, "which without the testimony of the Scriptures are holden as delivered from the Apostles, be thoroughly smitten down by the sword of God's word." St. Ambrose also, to Gratian the emperor: "Let the Scripture," saith he, "be asked the question, let the prophets be asked, and let Christ be asked." For at that time made the Catholic fathers and bishops no doubt but that our religion might be proved out of the Holy Scriptures. Neither were they ever so hardy as to take any for a heretic whose error they could not evidently and apparently reprove by the self-same Scriptures. And we verily do make answer on this wise, as St. Paul did: "According to this way which they call heresy we do worship God, and the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ; and do allow all things which have been written either in the law or in the Prophets," or in the Apostles' works.

Wherefore, if we be heretics, and they (as they would fain be called) be Catholics, why do they not, as they see the fathers, which were Catholic men, have always done? Why do they not convince and master us by the Divine Scriptures? Why do they not call us again to be tried by them? Why do they not lay before us how we have gone away from Christ, from the Prophets, from the Apostles, and from the holy fathers? Why stick they to do it? Why are they afraid of it? It is God's cause. Why are they doubtful to commit it to the trial of God's word? If we be heretics, which refer all our controversies unto the Holy Scriptures, and report us to the self-same words which we know were sealed by God Himself, and in comparison of them set little by all other things, whatsoever may be devised by men, how shall we say to these folk, I pray you what manner of men be they, and how is it meet to call them, which fear the judgment of the Holy Scriptures--that is to say, the judgment of God Himself--and do prefer before them their own dreams and full cold inventions; and, to maintain their own traditions, have defaced and corrupted, now these many hundred years, the ordinances of Christ and of the Apostles?

Men say that Sophocles, the tragical poet, when in his old days he was by his own sons accused before the judges for a doting and sottish man, as one that fondly wasted his own substance, and seemed to need a governor to see unto him; to the intent he might clear himself of the fault, he came into the place of judgment; and when he had rehearsed before them his tragedy called _OEdipus Coloneus_, which he had written at the very time of his accusation, marvellous exactly and cunningly, did of himself ask the judges whether they thought any sottish or doting man could do the like piece of work.

In like manner, because these men take us to be mad, and appeach us for heretics, as men which have nothing to do, neither with Christ, nor with the Church of God, we have judged it should be to good purpose, and not unprofitable, if we do openly and frankly set forth our faith wherein we stand, and show all that confidence which we have in Christ Jesu; to the intent all men may see what is our judgment of every part of Christian religion, and may resolve with themselves, whether the faith which they shall see confirmed by the words of Christ, by the writings of the Apostles, by the testimonies of the Catholic fathers, and by the examples of many ages, be but a certain rage of furious and mad men, and a conspiracy of heretics. This therefore is our belief.

John Jewel's Apology of the Church of England (1562) was composed in Latin for a European audience, defending the Reformed Church against charges of innovation. The translation by Anne Cooke Bacon, revised by Archbishop Matthew Parker, appeared in 1564. Jewel's argument hinges on a return to the first centuries of Christianity, a claim he supports by invoking patristic authorities such as Augustine and Bernard of Clairvaux. The text's rhetorical force derives from its combative tone, direct accusations, and vivid analogies—for instance, comparing opponents' evasiveness to a thief fleeing the gallows.

Patristic Authority as a Shield

Jewel repeatedly cites early Church fathers to legitimize the Reformed position. He quotes Bernard of Clairvaux calling certain bishops 'deceivers, beguilers, and Pilates'—a pointed reference to contemporary prelates. By aligning himself with Bernard, whom he notes was 'no Lutheran' and 'no heretic,' Jewel preempts accusations of novelty. He also invokes Augustine's directive to 'seek the Church' in the 'holy and canonical Scriptures,' framing the Reformation as a recovery of authentic tradition. This strategy turns the opponents' claim to Catholic continuity against them, suggesting that the true Church is identified not by institutional succession but by fidelity to Scripture and the early Church.

The Rhetoric of Direct Accusation

Jewel's prose is marked by confrontational second-person address and rhetorical questions. He asks of his adversaries: 'what one have these men at any time reformed? or what fault have they once acknowledged and confessed?' Such questions imply that the Roman Church has failed to correct its own errors. He also accuses them of fearing Scripture 'even as the thief flieth the gallows,' a simile that casts them as guilty and evasive. This directness, combined with the use of 'we' versus 'they,' creates a stark us-and-them dichotomy, reinforcing the Apology's function as a legal-style defense.

Metaphors of Malleability and Poison

A striking feature of Jewel's argument is his deployment of metaphors to discredit opponents' views of Scripture. He reports that they call the Bible 'a bare letter, uncertain, unprofitable, dumb, killing, and dead,' and liken it to 'a nose of wax, or a shipman's hose'—objects that can be shaped arbitrarily. Jewel counters by asserting that Scripture is 'sealed up' with Christ's blood, implying its inviolability. He also uses the image of the cantharus (a beetle) that dies when placed in balm, suggesting that opponents' cause is destroyed by the very Word they avoid. These analogies serve to ridicule the opposition while reinforcing the Apology's central claim: that the Reformed Church alone honors Scripture.

The Translator's Role and the 1564 Edition

Anne Cooke Bacon's translation, published anonymously as An Apologie or answere in defence of the Churche of Englande, was a significant scholarly achievement. The preface by Archbishop Matthew Parker (signed 'M. C.') praises her work and notes that it 'singularly pleased' him. Bacon, one of the most learned women of her time, rendered Jewel's Latin into English that retains the original's rhetorical punch—phrases like 'craftily bleared' and 'Pilates' carry the same force. The translation thus made Jewel's arguments accessible to English readers and helped shape the public defense of the Elizabethan Settlement.

Readers approaching Jewel's Apology should attend to its dual audience: European scholars reading the Latin original and English laypeople encountering Bacon's translation. The text rewards attention to its layered citations, its combative similes, and its strategic use of early Church authorities. It is not a systematic theology but a polemical brief, designed to reclaim the label 'Catholic' for the Reformed Church. The excerpts here offer a window into its method, though the full work develops these arguments at greater length.

Reading Jewel’s careful, almost tender plea for unity, I remembered sitting with my grandfather’s old copy of The Works of John Knox, Volume 1 (of 6) — Background and Themes one rainy Sunday, and how that fiery voice, too, was really just one man’s ache for a purer church. Both books shared the same quiet, unshakable hope. Strange, how centuries vanish when that longing feels so close, so personal, almost my own.

There are no reviews for this eBook.

0
0 out of 5 (0 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

What did you think of this book?

Answer a few questions and save a private reflection on this device.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

Which reading stage best describes you?

2

Did this book hold your interest?

3

How likely are you to recommend this book?

4

Did the language feel accessible?

Related eBooks