An Introduction to the Study of Comparative Religion — A Reader’s Guide

(0 User reviews)   638
Jevons, F. B. (Frank Byron), 1858-1936 Project Gutenberg 2010 Not confirmed
Religion Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 70,151
Reading time 306 min
Text sections 10

The catalog record for An Introduction to the Study of Comparative Religion — A Reader’s Guide provides practical reading context through 70,151 words, 5 hr 6 min estimated reading time, and 10 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 26.7 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Religion,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Jevons structures this 1908 lecture series as a comparative study of religious phenomena—immortality, magic, prayer, sacrifice—arguing that science establishes facts but cannot judge religious value. The work moves from defining religion's essence to examining specific practices, using missionary contexts as a recurring touchpoint.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.7/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

Gotama did not teach the transmigration of souls. What he did teach would be better summarized, if we wish to retain the word transmigration, as the transmigration of character. But it would be more accurate to drop the word transmigration altogether when speaking of Buddhism, and to call its doctrine the doctrine of karma. Gotama held that after the death of any being, {65} whether human or not, there survived nothing at all but that being's 'karma,' the result, that is, of its mental and bodily actions." "He discarded the theory of the presence, within each human body, of a soul which could have a separate and eternal existence. He therefore established a new identity between the individuals in the chain of existence, which he, like his forerunners, acknowledged, by the new assertion that that which made two beings to be the same being was--not soul, but--karma" (_ib._, pp. 93, 94). Thus once more it appears that there can be no eventual communion between the human soul, at the end of its chain of existence, and the divine, for the reason, not that the human soul ultimately ceases to be, but that it never is or was, and therefore neither transmigrates from one body to another, nor is eventually absorbed in the _atman_.

Logically consistent though this train of argument be, it leaves unanswered the simple question, How can the result of my actions have any interest for me--not hereafter, but at the present moment--if I not only shall not exist hereafter but do not exist at the present moment? It is not impossible for a man who believes that his existence will absolutely {66} cease at death to take some interest in and labour for the good of others who will come after him; but it is impossible for a man who does not exist now to believe in anything whatever. And it is on that fundamental absurdity that Buddhism is built: it is directed to the conversion of those who do not exist to be converted, and it is directed to the object of relieving from existence those who have no existence from which to be relieved.

Jevons opens with a methodological boundary: the science of religion can establish chronological order but not religious value. This distinction, drawn in the introduction, sets the tone for the entire work. The lectures, delivered at Hartford Theological Seminary, are designed to prepare missionaries, yet Jevons insists that facts must be accepted frankly, even if others use them for opposite purposes. The structure follows a logical progression from general principles to specific topics—immortality, magic, fetichism, prayer, sacrifice, morality—each chapter building on the last. A recurring image is that of the physician diagnosing health and disease, applied to missionary work with prayer: the missionary must know what is healthy before trying to cure.

Defining Religion Through Community and Sacrifice

Jevons distinguishes religion from animism and fetichism by insisting that a god is not merely a personal power feared or hoped for, but one worshipped by a community with sacrifice. He quotes Höffding to argue that religious feeling is rooted in the need to feel supported by a power beyond change. This definition recurs throughout the lectures, shaping his analysis of prayer and morality. The community, not the individual, is the unit of worship; the god is identified with the community's good. Jevons uses this criterion to separate genuine religion from magic or fetichism, which lack communal sacrifice. The argument is built on logical distinctions rather than ethnographic evidence, reflecting the lecture format's emphasis on conceptual clarity.

Prayer as a Habit to Be Trained, Not Created

In the chapter on prayer, Jevons employs the physician metaphor to argue that missionaries should not eradicate the habit of prayer among converts but train it. He cites the Khonds of Orissa, who pray, 'We are ignorant of what it is good to ask for. You...'—a fragment that illustrates his point that even 'heathen' prayer can contain humility. The structure of the chapter moves from general principle to specific example, then to practical advice for missionaries. Jevons warns against assuming that everything a savage prays for is wicked; instead, the missionary's task is to teach to whom and for what to pray. This section shows Jevons's careful balance between acknowledging non-Christian practices and asserting Christian superiority.

The Boundary Between Magic and Religion

Jevons devotes a chapter to magic, positioning it as distinct from religion. He argues that magic is coercive, while religion is supplicatory; magic manipulates impersonal forces, while religion addresses personal powers. The distinction is crucial for his overall argument that religion is essentially communal and sacrificial. He draws on examples of fetichism and animism to illustrate the line, but the excerpts show that his method is primarily conceptual rather than ethnographic. The structure of the chapter mirrors others: a definition, a contrast with religion, and a discussion of implications for missionaries. Jevons's voice is analytical, often using logical syllogisms to separate categories that might otherwise blur.

Immortality and the Search for Personal Power

The chapter on immortality opens the series after the introduction, suggesting its foundational role. Jevons treats immortality as a universal human concern, but he does not provide extensive ethnographic data in the excerpts. Instead, he links it to the search for a power essentially personal, which he sees as primary and primitive in religion. The structure of the chapter likely follows the pattern of defining the phenomenon, contrasting it with other beliefs, and drawing implications for Christian mission. The recurring image of the physician appears again in the prayer chapter, but the immortality chapter sets up the theme of personal power that recurs throughout the lectures. Jevons's method is to move from abstract principle to concrete application, always with the missionary audience in mind.

Jevons's lectures are best read as a series of conceptual distinctions rather than a survey of world religions. The structure—from definition to application—reflects their origin as training for missionaries. Readers should attend to how Jevons uses logic and metaphor to separate religion from magic, fetichism, and animism, and how he consistently returns to the community and sacrifice as defining features. The work is a product of its time, assuming Christian superiority while attempting a scientific approach to religious phenomena.

That grey afternoon, Jevons’s calm insistence that science can only describe, never judge, lingered with me like the rain itself. Later, idly curious how such comparative questions might feel from a wholly internal perspective, I found myself reaching for The Jewish religion — Reading Companion. It was a quieter turn, more intimate, yet somehow the same conversation continued without effort.

There are no reviews for this eBook.

0
0 out of 5 (0 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

Record your reading impressions

A brief reflection can help important ideas stay with you longer.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

What is your current status with this title?

2

Did this book hold your interest?

3

Is this a title you would suggest to others?

4

What was the reading difficulty like?

Related eBooks